Spring Trip 2019 – Part 1 – Monahans Sandhills State Park, Texas – continued

Before I continue with photography within this park, I will offer a brief review of the park and facilities.  There was some work being done at the visitor center at the entrance, when I was there.  This required one to go into the center to confirm one’s arrival and pay any fees that were due, rather than pay in the typical way at a reception window.  However, I was a bit confused by the signage at the entrance, thinking that I needed to drive on into the park to find the place to check in.  So I continued, following the signs to the camping area.  Upon getting to the RV area, I found a ranger helping another RVer with a big rig get into his assigned spot.  He came over to chat with me for awhile and told me how to best get to my reserved spot and told me I had a good spot adjacent to a sand dune on one side.  He also told me that he could come by, when he made his early morning rounds, and take me back to the visitor center to check in.  I informed him that I would probably be in the dunes in the early morning hours and late day hours.  I did not tell him why and he did not ask, but he looked a bit confused, since apparently few visitors get out that early into the dunes.  Anyway, even though I saw him passing by my place during my subsequent stay, he never stopped by and I never got any note on my vehicle, even though I did not have the typical sticker or receipt that the parks require on vehicles within the park.  I did stop by the visitor center as I was leaving the park to be sure all was ok and I was informed that all my fees were paid by the online reservation and I was all set to go.  I knew that I had paid the campsite fee, but I still thought that I had to pay the entrance fee, since my annual membership card was expired.

This is an old park and the facilities need some refurbishing, especially the restrooms and showers.  The showers are open with no privacy doors.  The shower water valves do not operate the way I expected and I initially thought there was no hot water.  This is a sandy place and visitors using the showers naturally leave much sand in the shower area.

The park is just north of I-20 and a railway that parallels I-20.  Being in the heart of the Permian Basin, there is much oil field truck traffic on I-20 and there were numerous trains passing by through out the night, so it can be rather noisy at night.  I must admit that the train whistle sound during the night was a bit nostalgic, since I recall hearing these during the night in my childhood home.

The days were mostly pleasantly cool during my visit, but the late night and early mornings were cold.  Even with chemical hand warmers in my fleece mittens, that opened to fingerless mode so that I could operate the camera controls, my finger tips got numb, especially just before sunrise, when I need them to not be so numb.

This is an Adobe Photoshop focus stack of 5 images, edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 31mm, f/11, 1/30s, ISO 64.

Apparently, there is much night life activity in the sand dunes, too.  The evidence of such is reflected by the many animal tracks in the sand, especially in the early morning hours before people walk through the dunes, disturbing the surface.

This image is created via focus stacking 5 images in Adobe Photoshop with edits in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 48mm, f/11, 1.6s – 2.0s, ISO 64.
An early morning photo of multiple animal tracks across sand dune ripples. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 42mm, ISO 64, f/11, 1/30s. Two images focus stacked in Adobe Photoshop, edited in Lightroom and DXO Nik software.
This is a composite of 5 images, edited in Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop and DXO Nik software. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 29mm, f/11, 1/40s, ISO 64.

In the late day excursions into the sandhills, I could hear coyotes yelping and they did not seem very far away.  I saw numerous coyote tracks in the dunes, so I’m sure they were hunting prey in the night time hours within the dunes.

You might note that all of the images above are created by focus stacking a number of images in Photoshop.  I like doing this to get sharpness through out an image, but there can be problems with doing this.  In particular, if there is motion, such as movement of vegetation or clouds, while taking a series of shots, the focus stacking might not work out well.  Since I knew I had this taking place in many of my shots, I inspected the results of each focus stacked image.  If there were movement effects noted, I would either abandon the focus stack method or try again with different photos.  If the movement effects were far in the background, where the image is not extremely sharp, anyway, I might ignore that and keep the resultant image.  This is ok as long as the image is not enlarged to such an extent that the movement or misalignment is apparent.  This is just a judgement call one has to make for such shots.  I’ve also noted that Photoshop sometimes selects the portions of images that it uses in the focus stack in what appears to be a non logical way, with blobs of images included within an area where most of a separate image is selected.  I’m sure that this is just a limitation of the software’s ability to distinguish sharpness for some portions of an image.  This might be corrected by manually stacking the images, but that gets into a lot more work in the editing process.

In a couple of my initial focus stacked images, I noted glaring misalignments that could not be attributed to motion.  Upon inspecting the original images, I noted that even though I typically sync adjustments across the images to be used in the focus stack process, the lens profile correction did not get applied to all images.  This might have been my error, not the software’s problem.  Upon correcting this, the focus stack misalignment issue went away.  So just something else to be aware of when using this technique.

Early morning in Monahans Sandhills SP. This is a composite of 5 photos, edited in Adobe LR, Photoshop and DXO Nik software. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 24mm, f/11, 1/60s, ISO 64.
Coyote footprints in Monahans Sandhills SP, Texas. Nikon D850, Nikon 14-24mm at 22mm, f/11, 1/200s, ISO 64. Edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software.

Readers might note that this is a great place to use the “leading lines” technique in photography.  There are very evident lines of multiple kinds in most of these photographs that serve to lead the eye through the photos.

Early morning light and shadows in the sandhills. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 24mm, f/11, 1/10s, ISO 64.

I like the long shadows streaking through the late day sunlit highlights on the dunes and the numerous animal tracks in the sands in this shot.

Early Morning in Monahans Sandhills SP, Texas. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 24mm, f/11, 1/13s, ISO 64.

In the photo above, I am not pleased with he sky.  Note that it is very blue on the right and much too bright on the left.  I first considered cropping to remove the sky, but I did not think I could get a pleasing crop.  Subsequently, I considered deleting this photo due to its obvious defect, but then I thought that this can be an example from which to learn.  The dark blue is probably due to the effect of the polarizing filter in a wide angle shot.  I usually try to minimize this effect, but I apparently neglected to do so in this shot.  I do not specifically remember using a graduated neutral density filter in this shot, but I think it most probable that I did.  I tried to edit the sky color to even it out a bit, but I did not like the results, so I just left it as it was.  Someone with great patience and skill in Photoshop could probably fix the sky, but I’m not so inclined.

I still have a few images from this park to share, so it looks like I will need to continue this in a separate post or two.

Ken

 

Spring Trip 2019 – Part 1 – Monahans Sandhills State Park, Texas

I finally got time to get away for a couple of weeks in March.  My destinations were largely determined by weather patterns and the distance between those possible destinations.  The first stop was Monahans Sandhills State Park between Odessa and Monahans, Texas.  This is a place that I first visited briefly in the 1980s, while on a business trip in the area.

I arrive at the Sandhills about mid-afternoon on a Saturday, where I had reservations in the RV camping area for two nights.  My campsite turned out to be in an advantageous site, adjacent to a dune that helped block the prevailing winds.  It had been very windy here just a few days prior, which is good, since the wind erases the surface disturbances created by visitors to the dunes.  However, I was there during a weekend, so I expected to have to work around the weekend visitors and their tracks in the sand dunes.

The park was fairly busy, as I expected, but the nightly winds helped mute the daily human disturbance of the sand dune surfaces.  Initially, I was not impressed by the photographic possibilities in the dunes and many of my photos lived up to those low expectations.  However, in the end I think I managed to get a few descent photos.  I will let the readers judge the results for themselves and maybe provide some feedback on the posted photos.

Sunset light and shadows in the sandhills. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 32mm, f/11, 1/200s, ISO 200. Edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software.
Sunset light in the sandhills. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 29mm, f/11, 1/250s, ISO 200. Edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software.

It was rather cloudy, especially the first day at sunset, so the late day light was intermittent and not as good as one would have liked for landscape photography. The clouds added drama to the sky, but I never got the brilliantly lit or colorful clouds that I had looked forward to.

Late day in the Sandhills. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 26mm, f/11, 1/250s, ISO 400. Edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software.

It was a bit of a challenge to find large areas of undisturbed sand, but as you can see in the above photo, I managed to find a few such areas.  Although, there are muted footprints in the sand in the upper left side of the photo.  In the previous photo, there are muted footprints evident in the right portion of the photo.  I do not think these are so strongly apparent as to distract from the natural appearance of the sand.

A composite of three images, edited in Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop and DXO Nik software. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm at 70mm (before crop), f/11, 1/60s, ISO 200.

The two trees in this photo are weather beaten and scraggly, but I like the glow in the sand at their base and the alternating dark to light in the sand ripples leading from the base of the photo to the trees.  This originally started out as a wider landscape view, but there were distracting elements on the right hand side, so I cropped the photo to remove the distraction.

Sunset in the Sandhills. Nikon D850, Nikon 24-70mm, at 36mm, f/11, 1/30s, ISO 640. Edited in Adobe Lightroom and DXO Nik software.

This sunset photo was taken at the end of my first day in the sandhills.  There are notable human infrastructure item along the horizon, some of which I removed or muted via editing, but I could never get all of those features removed without leaving unattractive artifacts, so I left most of them in the photo.  These are only visible and distracting, when one enlarges the photo.

This is enough for this post.  I will continue with more photos from the sandhills in the next post.

Ken

 

 

Why Are Some People So Disrespectful of Our Environment and Public Parks?

One of the things that makes me angry and sad is the litter that I see left by visitors to our public parks and public lands.  It is bad enough that there is litter and graffiti almost everywhere in public places and even marring private property, but why do those visiting our parks have such a disregard for the prominently displayed and publicized rules for being allowed to enjoy such places?

One would think that those seeking enjoyment of our great and scenic outdoor areas, would want to have those areas as unspoiled by human visitors as possible.  Apparently, this is not the case for many visitors.  Unfortunately, I think that we are failing as a society in inculcating respect and care for our environment, respect for public and private property.

This seems to be a universal problem.  I spent some time in Europe in the early 1970s.  When I visited again in the early 2000s, I was horrified by the level of graffiti and litter in the cities that has been so much neater and cleaner just 30 years earlier.  How is it that people think that marking buildings (public and private) and leaving their trash in public places is acceptable behavior?

I now encounter more and more litter and defacing of property or natural features in every public park and wilderness area I visit.  I found numerous beverage cans, bottles, clothing items or other litter in the sand dunes of Monahans Sandhills State Park, Texas during my recent visit.  Many of the items noted had been recently left there.  I’m guessing those leaving such items sometimes felt that they were being funny or cute with the way they left their trash.  It is neither funny nor cute.  It distracts from the natural beauty of such places.  Just stop it!  If a full beverage container or food package can be carried into an area, the empty package or container can easily be taken back out and disposed of properly.

Remember, take only memories (or photos) and leave only footprints, which nature will wipe away.

This piece of litter appears to have been purposely left in place. Please do not do this. Visitors to such places as this do not want to see your trash and will not think highly of you for leaving your trash, nor will they think this is funny or cute.

It is bad enough that one wanting to photograph our natural areas has to work to find places with no trace of human footprints, but those are mostly unavoidable and will eventually be erased by nature; but trash such as the beer can in the above photo will linger for many, many years.

I know that sometimes people drop items accidentally, but I have witnessed some purposely dropping or throwing trash away in public places.  If you see such behavior, please offer a friendly suggestion that they “accidentally” left some trash behind.  Maybe this will let them know that such behavior is not acceptable.

If you find such litter in a public place, especially our great natural parks and public lands, if possible take it to a proper disposal place.

Rantingly yours,

Ken

The Importance of Light Quality in Landscape Photography

I’ve just returned from a two weeks road trip and, as usual, after such trips there is much to do before I can get around to reviewing the photos taken during such trips.  Added onto the usual catching up with items around the house, I’ve had to work to correct some software issues, at least some of which I created myself due to the way I decided to use a portable hard drive for Lightroom photos and the Lightroom catalog, so that I can work from both laptop and desktop computers.

In addition, I decided to upgrade my old Nik software, which has not been supported for some time now, to the new DXO Nik version.  The software installed and ran on my MacBook Pro, but it did not want to run properly on my iMac.  It took quite a bit of work over a couple of days to sort this out.  In the end, I’m not sure what action(s) actually cured the problem, but at least now it is operational.  In the process I learned how to remove the links to the old Nik versions from Lightroom.  One would think this would be an easy, straight forward task, but no search of Adobe’s Help yielded any results on this topic, nor was DXO support completely helpful.  Finally, I got suggestions from the Adobe community forum, none of which related directly to my installation, but at least got me onto the right track, allowing me to find and remove the problem files.

So now back to the subject of this post.  Experienced landscape photographers need not read any more of this post, since I’m not revealing anything new here.  However, beginners or novice landscape photographers might benefit from information shared here.

Light is the essence of photography.  It is light that allows one to make photographs and the properties of light affect the resulting photographs.  Readers may have heard the term “Golden Hour Light”, used by landscape photographers. This term refers to natural light just as the sun is rising or setting.  At these times, when the sun is low in the sky, sunlight has to travel through more of the earth’s atmosphere, which favors the transmission of the warmer colors, filtering out the cooler colors.  It is the “warmer light” that really bring to life objects illuminated by such light.

In this post I am showing an example of a scene shot with only the beginnings of this light and one with much more of this golden hour light.

A shot with just a hint of golden hour light peeking through the clouds.

The photo above, while lacking in great depth of field, shows the effect of muted late day light.  It was a cloudy day and only a little golden hour light is getting through the cloud cover.  This photo is taken looking north with the sunlight coming from the west.  This is referred to as sidelight and is good for casting shadows, adding depth to a 2 dimensional photo.  Note that there is only a sliver of brighter light going diagonally from the lower left corner towards the upper right and there are minimal shadows, but at least the light alternates in a repeating cycle from dark to light across the photograph.  The overall tone is dark.  Compare this to the photo below, taken just moments later.

A shot with almost full golden hour light.

The cloud cover is still muting the light in the second photo, but it is obviously much brighter and warmer with stronger shadows.  The original image files for each of these final images are raw camera files with adjustments in Adobe Lightroom and Nik software.  I’ve applied essentially the same edits to both photos.  The difference the light properties make in these images is obvious.  The second image “pops” much more than the first image.

As a side note, there is a photo shoot within these photos, which I did not fully realize, until enlarging these images during the processing.  In the first photo, near the upper center in the sand just below the sky there are three figures, one female on the left in a red dress and two males to her right.  At the time I took the photo, I just noted that there were three people walking in the background.  While processing the second photo, I noted these same three people now grouped together just below the skyline on the left side of the photo.  The enlargement shows a lighting umbrella device on a tripod, hence the conclusion that this is a photo shoot of the female in the red dress.  These figures are only clearly visible (but not in sharp focus), if one enlarges the photo.

That is all for this post.  I will have much more to share from this trip in subsequent posts.

Until then,

Ken